Just another example of "radical feminism" - you know, that whole having to be awake to give consent to sex radical feminism.
From The Australian:
She says they had consensual sex but she woke up the next morning to find him having intercourse with her to which she had not consented.
Thank you for some intelligence The The Daily Telegraph:
Assange - supported by everyone from Geoffrey Robertson to John Pilger - is seeking to avoid extradition to Sweden with a twofold strategy.
First, they claim this is not really about Swedish sex, but an evil conspiracy (led by well-known tyrant Barack Obama).
Second, they fling muck at the alleged victims.
They must be "confused", Assange himself says.
The women are "victims of the police", who have "bamboozled" them.
They got jealous when they realised Assange had seduced both of them. They are lying.
Oh, and Swedish law is much too harsh on men who fail to use a condom when explicitly asked to do so by their female sex partners. That's what Assange and his supporters say.
So how did we come to a point where the left-leaning intelligentsia - which now apparently includes Jemima Khan - is instantly dismissive of women who claim to be victims of sexual violence?
Why shouldn't Assange face the charges, like anyone else accused of a sexual crime?
Via Jezebel re: Assange's "Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of Feminism," where the commenters like Jennifer17 are whipsmart:
By the way, actual consciousness is the Wikileaks of sex. Get a clue.